
The couple last days, I have been so busy and I have met with a lot of people who are interested in knowing much more about my country of origin, Syria. I met with a western friend and we started to talk about the Internet in Syria. When I mentioned some banned websites in the country, such as Facebook, blogspot, and youtube as well as dozens of Syrian dissidents’ websites, he replied with surprise, ” how can that happen, what about the tourists and the foreign students in Syria? Can’t they use Facebook and youtube?”
His question is a 100% right but it was funny to me.” If the Syrian regime doesn’t care about its citizens, why should it care about the foreigners?” I asked myself.
But really, you might ask yourself why a strong regime like the one in Syrian should really care about blocking a blog or facebook or any website?
I have answered this question when speaking with a reporter from The New York Times . I told the reporter, “They [the regime] are strong on one hand, but on another they are so weak they are afraid of an Internet cafe.” So how they are strong and weak at the same time?
Before Assad inherited his power, we all knew him as the president of the “Syrian computer society,” an NGO aiming to develop internet service in the country. This was back when his father was still alive and was preparing his son to inherit the power. That tricked all of us — even the west policy makers were tricked — and Assad was assumed to be a “a part of the internet generation” in the eyes of the western policy makers, quite unlike his father the General. This view of Assad made the western world willing to overlook the unconstitutionality of Assad’s coming to power, because everyone believed he would be different from his father.
In 1970, Assad the Senior took power in a coup d’état. Gradually, he started to crack down on all the Syrian groups who opposed his regime. Many Syrian dissents were arrested and kept in jail for ten or even twenty years. Others were killed. All the unions were dissolved by Assad’s orders, and their leaders were often arrested. Assad established new puppet unions, which belonged to the ruling Baath party. During this time, a person could be arrested merely for reading a newsletter written by one of the Syrian opposition group.
By the year 2000, only Syrian doctors, lawyers and engineers were allowed to use the dial-up internet service in the country. A year later, the internet usage was opened up to any citizen who might want it, but they were required to fill out an “application” which required their names, their fathers’ names, mothers’ name, addresses and even the password to their private emails!
The internet fees were expensive compared to the income of an average citizen. Yet in spite of the fees, the number of the internet users in 2005 had reached five hundred thousand, according to the Human Rights Watch.
The Syrians thirsted for this service, after 30 years of bans and arrests and the repression of all the other voices. Syrian citizens were enthusiastic to know what was going on in their own country and finally they were able to do so, through access to digital foreign papers that were banned inside Syria. It was ironic, that the only way to learn news about Syria was to turn to papers written outside of Syria, but unfortunately, that had been the case for some time. It’s worth mentioning that before the internet became widespread, people in the areas bordering Israel had tried to watch the Israeli Arabic news broadcasting to get a non-government sponsored view of their own country, until Assad the elder had the channel blocked inside Syria.
After internet usage was opened to the public, the Syrian regime started its campaign against the internet and internet users. Many bloggers were arrested. Others were arrested merely for receiving an electronic newsletter in their email. A lot of newspapers were blocked, and youtube and Facebook were soon to follow.
In 1970, Assad the elder seized power. In 2000, Assad junior inherited the power from his father. The father blocked any voice not sponsored by the government and arrested all the democracy activists, and the son followed in his footsteps, arresting activists and the new virtual online activists. The Syrian groups who had been arrested during the time of the father started to appear online; for example, on Facebook we started to see a lot of Syrian virtual groups supporting causes considered taboo in Syria. Groups of Syrian activists began talking about civil marriage in Syria, others calling for democracy in the country, and a group of Israeli and Syrian activists even began issuing a joint call for peace between Syrian and Israel. All of these things were unspoken of inside Syria. The voices that had been banned in reality, made silent by the threat of the strong military and security forces of the regime, were expressed online, in droves. In 2007, Syrians had been forced to affirm Assad’s claim to power at the ballot boxes, but online, those claims were refuted and people spoke out against Assad freely. This why a regime like The Syrian could be afraid from a blog.
However, I assured my western friend, the blocking of Facebook and Youtube and such sites was entirely aimed at Syrian citizens. As proof of this, I told him about the situation with Wikipedia. Wikipedia Arabic is banned in Syria, alongside other social sites. Wikipedia English is still available, though, for the benefit of the tourists and foreign students. The regime is not worried about Wikipedia English – Syrian citizens are not expected to know English and thus will not take advantage of this unblocked site. So when he goes to Syria, I assured him, he may not be able to check his Facebook status, but at least he can still use Wikipedia, as long as he only uses the English site!












